¡ LIVE NOW @ live.novaramedia.com !
suicide mark zuckerberg university of london higher education conference season housing crisis Secular Crisis mental health deep state solidarity Claudia Jones france cost of living pay gap cities lgbt secret employee obama eire wages rape culture irish water Scottish Independence whiteness birmingham mob dan whittall syria boko haram edl magna carta star trek yes scotland productivity romani olympics eric pickles hydra clr james morality maria miller bjp russia migrants northern ireland organising clegg demands silicon valley nhs geography warwick fe womens liberation omar aziz theft radical housing network rob ford owen jones kurdistan is middle east legitimacy ge2015 Adam Ramsay iraq consumption mcgettigan david harvey salmond feminism automation accessibility security usa anxiety neoliberalism Centre Left space sport privatisation privatisaton catalan independence engels hague chuka umunna trident hollaback religion coalition ncafc class struggle george osborne privatization marx demographics christmas nato egypt charlie hebdo eurozone ubi conchita refusal help to buy estate austerity publishing no borders Labour Party footwear education aboriginal james butler value prison anarchism sturgeon data world cup adam stoneman he business arran james rotherham manifesto ecb social housing willetts roma gypsies Race arab spring tax Tuzla isis focus e15 buy-to-let tax reform international occupation syriza review uber free speech work intersectionality labour fascism technology london pasok lse depression putin stealing uprising bell hooks sussex universal basic income sexism synthetic hedge tabitha bast riots cameron revolution populism women politics ipr antiziganism madness free education communities bennett housing tactics psoe housing action scotland gender mark duggan crisis government YesVote benefits intervention orientalism israel brazil desire james meadway tax evasion projects nus airstrikes politicians evictions tuition fees employment apps big pharma romanichal radical lives ttip columnism rusell brand asn ual rape political economy germany videos reproductive rights pharmaceuticals mark regev al qaeda trolling ge2012 west bank trade unions privacy cable bnp cpi carpenters health comedians bouchart occupy right to buy cooperatives britain first miners strike economics student loans property new democracy unions balls care work eu india portugal tsipras jeremy hunt young people media plaid cymru law care Gentrification ukraine thatcher isil miliband zero hours socialist student movement andrew dolan pluralism calais social reproduction mark carney future strategy of refusal debt new york mike brown modi hamas asia interest digital media orange order music nypd BBC red wedge architecture blockupy cup maps funerals Media bias sussex five masons immigration budget2014 crimea living wage atheism Police pop culture start up inequality snp david cameron troika student debt precariousness pasokification gaza uk precarious europe direct action general election electoral fraud precarity cuts left greens sophie lewis protests workfare glasgow bias unemployment pfi leaders debate post-fordism nurses public sector eleanor penny krugman midwives millbank china colonialism andy burnham angela mcrobie nef eurovision student politics uk uncut podemos uaf growth ultras Niki Seth-Smith Elections culture literature greek election catalunya Dawkins uffc protest poverty sexual violence james meek newham obr workers europe met alia al ghussain workplace reappropriation mubarak interviews social networks islamophobia autonomism pay England bingo ethics paul nuttall jesus strikes post-capitalism catalonia rbi Tom Abree landlords localism financialisation marxism IndyRef trans memes treasury novara wire internet libertarianism class natalie bennett police brutality martin lewis inflation history chris grayling justice native racism tuc UKIP capitalism rent welfare state antifascism cantona dale farm rmt spain holocaust asylum kurds reappropriation books yes scotand property rights loans rent strike homelessness conservatives legal aid tories police violence Economy ulu kerry idf libdems state ello palestine david willetts marketing malcolm x vaga de totes anti-capitalism lawrence and wishart ferguson canada fees rojava refusal of work national liberation comedy strike rpi ireland netanyahu safety results green party television pablo iglesias social cleansing spending queer 22o psychiatry bonuses basic income greece nationalism subversion travellers journalism ACAB kobane utopia charlie lahr Craig McVegas production Policing m18 gary barlow imf sisi people's assembly Aaron Bastani money jobs 15m golden dawn morsi social movements christianity finance university facebook crime #copsoffcampus football open democracy

Do They Owe Us a Living? 7 Reasons the Universal Basic Income is Worth Fighting For.

submit to reddit

The Universal Basic Income (UBI) – sometimes called the Unconditional Basic Income, Citizens’ Income or Social Wage – has in recent times become a focus of economic discussion across the political spectrum. While column inches in the Financial Times and The Economist have been racking up, academics such as Stuart White have been articulating how valid cases for the UBI can be made from communist, liberal and republican perspectives. Here Andrew Dolan offers 7 reasons why the UBI should matter to people who want to move beyond capitalism:

1. Wages aren’t working.

Since the 2008 financial crisis it has become increasingly impossible to survive on wage labour. In real terms, wages in the UK have declined 9 percent in the last 5 years, whilst in the same period the cost of living has risen 25 percent. Combined with mass unemployment and the reduction of welfare the situation is worse than any in recent memory. Whether in or out of work, poverty is a reality for millions of people living in the UK, the world’s sixth largest economy.

2. Full employment is neither possible nor desirable.

From Conservative to Labour to the TUC, the solution offered to this problem is reducible to one dominant idea: economic growth. Grow the economy and jobs will follow, or so the logic goes. Yet as automation accelerates and human labour becomes ever more unnecessary for the production of goods a return to full employment is quite simply impossible, with or without growth. As for an expanding service sector, neither Costa nor Credit Suisse can employ everyone and nor is it desirable that they do. A new response is needed, one that recognises and seeks to overcome these contradictions. A universal basic income is one such response.

3. It’s unconditional.

A universal basic income would ensure that everyone, regardless of employment, earnings, age and gender, receives an income from the state: a single weekly or monthly monetary payment with no stipulations as to how it, or the time of its recipients, is spent. A universal basic income would guarantee a minimum standard of living and relief from poverty where work and current welfare cannot. In this sense, it is an extension of the social democratic promise; as a non-reformist reform, however, it sets the stage for the further transformation of society.

4. It undermines the necessity of work.

However it is funded, as a wage separate from production a universal basic income not only recognises the impossibility of full employment but also has the potential to undermine the mythical sanctity of work—a controlling ideology of capitalism—and accelerate the discussion and struggle over what work is necessary, how it will be done, and for whom. More immediately, a universal basic income could provide the money and time with which to collectively create spaces that embody alternative cultural and social values to those currently dominant.

5. UBI is going mainstream.

Admittedly, the introduction of a universal basic income swims against the seemingly unstoppable neoliberal current, which has accelerated the dismantling of the welfare state and elevated an ethic of entrepreneurial individualism. There are, however, a growing number of mainstream politicians and economists, most notably Paul Krugman, who have voiced support for a universal basic income as a possible solution to the impact of automation and a means through which to redistribute some of the gains of capital and stimulate market demand.

6. UBI represents an opportunity.

Although the vision of Krugman et al remains subservient to economic growth, it is the appeal of a universal basic income to those seeking the maintenance of capitalism that renders its implementation relatively feasible. In other words, the requirements of capitalism—in this instance the need for consumers—create opportunities that can be exploited by those looking to transcend it. If capitalism is to be stabilised once more then let it be on terms more favourable to society and with consequences that lay the foundations for a post-capitalist future.

7. We need to make the case for a UBI on our terms.

One cannot, of course, rely on the largesse of economic and political elites, nor mistake opportunity for inevitability. A universal basic income will not simply be given; it must be demanded, as it has been by growing numbers in Berlin, Rome and in particular Switzerland, amongst others. A universal basic income is not a panacea for the social and economic problems of capitalism and its transformative potential is dependent on greater democratic control of the state and a reduction of the working week. Nor should campaigning for it supersede workplace organising; it should, on the other hand, compliment it. Yet organising for a universal basic income presents the possibility of the employed and unemployed uniting around a shared demand that, whilst recognising the inadequacies of work, seeks not its improvement but the creation of a sphere independent from it.