¡ LIVE NOW @ live.novaramedia.com !
glasgow economics wages greens secret employee coalition racism labour crisis pablo iglesias national liberation is cuts Tuzla theft pop culture hamas hollaback law Dawkins television class struggle revolution rmt catalonia china malcolm x employment tabitha bast inflation social movements social reproduction james meadway vaga de totes star trek david cameron cup germany videos trident catalan independence orange order nef communities fascism IndyRef tsipras electoral fraud space anti-capitalism millbank organising andrew dolan desire Economy ferguson prison podemos antifascism silicon valley ethics russia thatcher post-fordism young people benefits university of london tuition fees justice kurds mubarak gaza safety future media depression social networks engels usa adam stoneman welfare state tax reform occupation olympics projects rusell brand omar aziz holocaust rape homelessness student movement property strike evictions political economy gary barlow aboriginal England dan whittall Race ello imf left new york basic income antiziganism pasokification tories demographics business synthetic hedge asn sussex gender government angela mcrobie newham krugman rent sussex five Elections christmas tax evasion yes scotand eurozone Media bias mark zuckerberg christianity psoe apps rape culture 15m Secular Crisis finance ecb ireland orientalism review golden dawn women mark regev nato conchita football mob gypsies canada workplace reappropriation mike brown ipr brazil putin social housing rent strike modi intersectionality asylum stealing asia culture intervention feminism Adam Ramsay lgbt BBC james butler Gentrification work cities maps marxism novara wire madness pasok memes ACAB precarious europe israel conference season housing financialisation romani privatization universal basic income value native social cleansing literature comedy romanichal charlie hebdo legal aid inequality student politics strikes bell hooks footwear reproductive rights privacy productivity solidarity budget2014 willetts libertarianism cooperatives open democracy care work funerals crime palestine direct action scotland poverty lawrence and wishart no borders paul nuttall interest Claudia Jones cable world cup interviews buy-to-let big pharma police brutality trade unions refusal new democracy columnism loans estate boko haram troika george osborne catalunya middle east psychiatry spending sport rob ford atheism tuc masons mark duggan eurovision education bjp ttip warwick ncafc YesVote uaf housing crisis india bias radical lives eu religion martin lewis public sector privatisaton greek election money sisi nationalism occupy workers architecture police violence morality facebook geography idf ge2015 privatisation austerity growth populism islamophobia socialist mark carney Niki Seth-Smith airstrikes free speech west bank help to buy uk spain nurses start up reappropriation books britain first nypd isis zero hours isil Aaron Bastani dale farm autonomism music irish water property rights marketing consumption riots health protests womens liberation post-capitalism technology libdems travellers 22o kurdistan cameron birmingham he colonialism treasury digital media red wedge cost of living jeremy hunt rbi france politicians europe ultras unemployment al qaeda anxiety publishing roma bouchart arran james carpenters pay data tax strategy of refusal localism queer morsi uk uncut pluralism people's assembly uber Scottish Independence eleanor penny UKIP mcgettigan production nus focus e15 care student debt egypt ukraine conservatives cpi kobane trans higher education portugal hydra bnp pay gap david willetts obama landlords precarity greece andy burnham migrants balls general election mental health university calais tactics iraq demands kerry magna carta syria clr james salmond manifesto david harvey hague unions precariousness marx capitalism neoliberalism uffc james meek london politics bingo ubi eire uprising Police #copsoffcampus protest international met miliband midwives eric pickles charlie lahr Craig McVegas maria miller pharmaceuticals student loans trolling crimea class immigration fees Centre Left owen jones debt rojava comedians bonuses internet history natalie bennett sophie lewis nhs rotherham green party Tom Abree journalism utopia suicide results sexism edl arab spring yes scotland chuka umunna Labour Party obr living wage syriza anarchism Policing alia al ghussain pfi jesus rpi chris grayling free education right to buy ulu ge2012 refusal of work cantona workfare

Do They Owe Us a Living? 7 Reasons the Universal Basic Income is Worth Fighting For.

submit to reddit

The Universal Basic Income (UBI) – sometimes called the Unconditional Basic Income, Citizens’ Income or Social Wage – has in recent times become a focus of economic discussion across the political spectrum. While column inches in the Financial Times and The Economist have been racking up, academics such as Stuart White have been articulating how valid cases for the UBI can be made from communist, liberal and republican perspectives. Here Andrew Dolan offers 7 reasons why the UBI should matter to people who want to move beyond capitalism:

1. Wages aren’t working.

Since the 2008 financial crisis it has become increasingly impossible to survive on wage labour. In real terms, wages in the UK have declined 9 percent in the last 5 years, whilst in the same period the cost of living has risen 25 percent. Combined with mass unemployment and the reduction of welfare the situation is worse than any in recent memory. Whether in or out of work, poverty is a reality for millions of people living in the UK, the world’s sixth largest economy.

2. Full employment is neither possible nor desirable.

From Conservative to Labour to the TUC, the solution offered to this problem is reducible to one dominant idea: economic growth. Grow the economy and jobs will follow, or so the logic goes. Yet as automation accelerates and human labour becomes ever more unnecessary for the production of goods a return to full employment is quite simply impossible, with or without growth. As for an expanding service sector, neither Costa nor Credit Suisse can employ everyone and nor is it desirable that they do. A new response is needed, one that recognises and seeks to overcome these contradictions. A universal basic income is one such response.

3. It’s unconditional.

A universal basic income would ensure that everyone, regardless of employment, earnings, age and gender, receives an income from the state: a single weekly or monthly monetary payment with no stipulations as to how it, or the time of its recipients, is spent. A universal basic income would guarantee a minimum standard of living and relief from poverty where work and current welfare cannot. In this sense, it is an extension of the social democratic promise; as a non-reformist reform, however, it sets the stage for the further transformation of society.

4. It undermines the necessity of work.

However it is funded, as a wage separate from production a universal basic income not only recognises the impossibility of full employment but also has the potential to undermine the mythical sanctity of work—a controlling ideology of capitalism—and accelerate the discussion and struggle over what work is necessary, how it will be done, and for whom. More immediately, a universal basic income could provide the money and time with which to collectively create spaces that embody alternative cultural and social values to those currently dominant.

5. UBI is going mainstream.

Admittedly, the introduction of a universal basic income swims against the seemingly unstoppable neoliberal current, which has accelerated the dismantling of the welfare state and elevated an ethic of entrepreneurial individualism. There are, however, a growing number of mainstream politicians and economists, most notably Paul Krugman, who have voiced support for a universal basic income as a possible solution to the impact of automation and a means through which to redistribute some of the gains of capital and stimulate market demand.

6. UBI represents an opportunity.

Although the vision of Krugman et al remains subservient to economic growth, it is the appeal of a universal basic income to those seeking the maintenance of capitalism that renders its implementation relatively feasible. In other words, the requirements of capitalism—in this instance the need for consumers—create opportunities that can be exploited by those looking to transcend it. If capitalism is to be stabilised once more then let it be on terms more favourable to society and with consequences that lay the foundations for a post-capitalist future.

7. We need to make the case for a UBI on our terms.

One cannot, of course, rely on the largesse of economic and political elites, nor mistake opportunity for inevitability. A universal basic income will not simply be given; it must be demanded, as it has been by growing numbers in Berlin, Rome and in particular Switzerland, amongst others. A universal basic income is not a panacea for the social and economic problems of capitalism and its transformative potential is dependent on greater democratic control of the state and a reduction of the working week. Nor should campaigning for it supersede workplace organising; it should, on the other hand, compliment it. Yet organising for a universal basic income presents the possibility of the employed and unemployed uniting around a shared demand that, whilst recognising the inadequacies of work, seeks not its improvement but the creation of a sphere independent from it.