¡ LIVE NOW @ live.novaramedia.com !
brazil gary barlow cooperatives ACAB 22o trade unions care andy burnham neoliberalism Tuzla marketing nhs whiteness privatisaton unite labour snp mike brown holocaust unions rojava nurses morality maria miller syria #copsoffcampus safety uaf people's assembly Scottish Independence fees natalie bennett poverty putin state bennett morsi autonomism sport krugman populism education welfare state queer asn kerry results bnp coalition social networks christmas met sisi estate architecture pluralism travellers anxiety digital media direct action yes scotland conchita banks france left unity rent strike rotherham revolution kobane owen jones police violence tax nationalism palestine uprising crime isis workplace reappropriation protest balls social reproduction roma netanyahu vaga de totes health anti-capitalism Dawkins ttip thatcher canada interviews Policing psychiatry spending jeremy hunt bell hooks engels catalonia mubarak strategy of refusal conference season madness uk internet angela mcrobie pay gap clegg green party ultras marxism suicide loans asia david harvey bingo bjp refusal malcolm x tactics antiziganism zero hours intersectionality cost of living intervention universal basic income fascism media ubi hsbc treasury data evictions omar aziz he al qaeda colonialism work arran james footwear racism asylum comedians sophie lewis focus e15 inflation history radical housing network debt political economy young people maps pfi conservatives living wage Race legitimacy ulu Economy music occupy Secular Crisis plaid cymru precarious europe housing action tuc football organising mark zuckerberg lawrence and wishart nef radical lives womens liberation deflation salmond russia james meadway feminism rent mark carney sussex catalunya hamas Elections gender lgbt economics industrial action homelessness no borders YesVote strike legal aid m18 irish water capitalism 15m revolt of the ladders ipr start up strikes germany britain first northern ireland sexual violence BBC immigration finance cpi publishing university of london bias privatisation chuka umunna isil hague uk uncut ethics cuts pop culture anarchism funerals ncafc ge2015 james meek sussex five ge2012 libdems manifesto golden dawn public sector andrew dolan Tom Abree Media bias libertarianism rpi masons rape culture david cameron islamophobia housing crisis ukraine nypd trolling religion orange order facebook usa gypsies higher education buy-to-let England new york christianity aboriginal right to buy china deep state blockupy miners strike greece west bank barts health justice UKIP eric pickles financialisation nus iraq carpenters pablo iglesias arab spring portugal housing ecb workfare Claudia Jones books olympics psoe sexism Aaron Bastani secret employee uffc millbank bouchart theft boko haram world cup orientalism technology television police brutality hotels Police free speech dan whittall tories native accessibility left revuelta de escaleras memes nato business ual reappropriation new democracy comedy london women riots student debt student loans utopia social cleansing socialist martin lewis greens scotland Adam Ramsay automation star trek trident property rights eurovision demographics romanichal pasok catalan independence david willetts synthetic hedge glasgow literature sturgeon desire europe politics hospitality tax reform edl migrants Labour Party class struggle future demands jesus rmt rape protests yes scotand pasokification unemployment eleanor penny rusell brand warwick podemos workers tabitha bast mob electoral fraud is charlie hebdo politicians open democracy cup productivity chris grayling ferguson space electoral reform cable eu india gaza eire wages property austerity clr james free education videos bonuses obama post-capitalism cantona romani idf george osborne projects Niki Seth-Smith cities journalism ireland precariousness student politics spain apps inequality mark regev newham obr nick clegg communities depression reproductive rights class james butler bank of england egypt refusal of work barclays pay rbi mcgettigan government help to buy mark duggan Craig McVegas Centre Left kurdistan IndyRef columnism landlords hydra kurds hollaback alia al ghussain value eurozone consumption law modi fe university budget2014 employment atheism working class production student movement social movements international citizenship security money solidarity care work rob ford general election benefits uber Gentrification tax evasion social housing localism ello trans paul nuttall post-fordism jobs leaders debate precarity lse middle east troika mental health dale farm electoralism tsipras privatization antifascism syriza growth big pharma privacy stealing miliband subversion review cameron adam stoneman national liberation calais silicon valley greek election crisis willetts oil interest occupation basic income red wedge tuition fees crimea novara wire marx pharmaceuticals birmingham charlie lahr imf airstrikes midwives israel magna carta culture prison geography telefonica

Do They Owe Us a Living? 7 Reasons the Universal Basic Income is Worth Fighting For.

submit to reddit

The Universal Basic Income (UBI) – sometimes called the Unconditional Basic Income, Citizens’ Income or Social Wage – has in recent times become a focus of economic discussion across the political spectrum. While column inches in the Financial Times and The Economist have been racking up, academics such as Stuart White have been articulating how valid cases for the UBI can be made from communist, liberal and republican perspectives. Here Andrew Dolan offers 7 reasons why the UBI should matter to people who want to move beyond capitalism:

1. Wages aren’t working.

Since the 2008 financial crisis it has become increasingly impossible to survive on wage labour. In real terms, wages in the UK have declined 9 percent in the last 5 years, whilst in the same period the cost of living has risen 25 percent. Combined with mass unemployment and the reduction of welfare the situation is worse than any in recent memory. Whether in or out of work, poverty is a reality for millions of people living in the UK, the world’s sixth largest economy.

2. Full employment is neither possible nor desirable.

From Conservative to Labour to the TUC, the solution offered to this problem is reducible to one dominant idea: economic growth. Grow the economy and jobs will follow, or so the logic goes. Yet as automation accelerates and human labour becomes ever more unnecessary for the production of goods a return to full employment is quite simply impossible, with or without growth. As for an expanding service sector, neither Costa nor Credit Suisse can employ everyone and nor is it desirable that they do. A new response is needed, one that recognises and seeks to overcome these contradictions. A universal basic income is one such response.

3. It’s unconditional.

A universal basic income would ensure that everyone, regardless of employment, earnings, age and gender, receives an income from the state: a single weekly or monthly monetary payment with no stipulations as to how it, or the time of its recipients, is spent. A universal basic income would guarantee a minimum standard of living and relief from poverty where work and current welfare cannot. In this sense, it is an extension of the social democratic promise; as a non-reformist reform, however, it sets the stage for the further transformation of society.

4. It undermines the necessity of work.

However it is funded, as a wage separate from production a universal basic income not only recognises the impossibility of full employment but also has the potential to undermine the mythical sanctity of work—a controlling ideology of capitalism—and accelerate the discussion and struggle over what work is necessary, how it will be done, and for whom. More immediately, a universal basic income could provide the money and time with which to collectively create spaces that embody alternative cultural and social values to those currently dominant.

5. UBI is going mainstream.

Admittedly, the introduction of a universal basic income swims against the seemingly unstoppable neoliberal current, which has accelerated the dismantling of the welfare state and elevated an ethic of entrepreneurial individualism. There are, however, a growing number of mainstream politicians and economists, most notably Paul Krugman, who have voiced support for a universal basic income as a possible solution to the impact of automation and a means through which to redistribute some of the gains of capital and stimulate market demand.

6. UBI represents an opportunity.

Although the vision of Krugman et al remains subservient to economic growth, it is the appeal of a universal basic income to those seeking the maintenance of capitalism that renders its implementation relatively feasible. In other words, the requirements of capitalism—in this instance the need for consumers—create opportunities that can be exploited by those looking to transcend it. If capitalism is to be stabilised once more then let it be on terms more favourable to society and with consequences that lay the foundations for a post-capitalist future.

7. We need to make the case for a UBI on our terms.

One cannot, of course, rely on the largesse of economic and political elites, nor mistake opportunity for inevitability. A universal basic income will not simply be given; it must be demanded, as it has been by growing numbers in Berlin, Rome and in particular Switzerland, amongst others. A universal basic income is not a panacea for the social and economic problems of capitalism and its transformative potential is dependent on greater democratic control of the state and a reduction of the working week. Nor should campaigning for it supersede workplace organising; it should, on the other hand, compliment it. Yet organising for a universal basic income presents the possibility of the employed and unemployed uniting around a shared demand that, whilst recognising the inadequacies of work, seeks not its improvement but the creation of a sphere independent from it.