¡ LIVE NOW @ live.novaramedia.com !
arran james intersectionality trident warwick morsi tabitha bast new democracy green party rent Adam Ramsay arab spring neoliberalism general election left unemployment usa greece maria miller student politics iraq pop culture reappropriation germany angela mcrobie bjp cpi hollaback pharmaceuticals Niki Seth-Smith psychiatry is dale farm labour start up columnism owen jones london housing gary barlow media right to buy modi social networks rmt direct action politicians work russia libertarianism Secular Crisis geography anti-capitalism james meadway boko haram ulu troika free speech racism evictions Elections rent strike money tuition fees television finance #copsoffcampus adam stoneman architecture interviews fascism atheism palestine unions cities world cup solidarity basic income projects bell hooks fees isil data political economy demands sport populism budget2014 antiziganism sophie lewis memes ferguson strategy of refusal focus e15 sisi public sector protest brazil israel dan whittall estate newham privatization university social movements aboriginal precarity china ipr government space crimea England music interest Media bias podemos eleanor penny internet obr Tom Abree Craig McVegas national liberation ttip chuka umunna bonuses 22o uaf queer romani occupy university of london conchita education social reproduction Police kerry mob syriza people's assembly tax evasion benefits young people gaza pasok loans production manifesto charlie lahr nationalism idf help to buy thatcher Policing care work rob ford international greek election UKIP clr james refusal Aaron Bastani ultras crime Race trade unions uffc radical lives paul nuttall jesus housing crisis egypt free education conservatives precarious europe landlords yes scotand andrew dolan history george osborne sussex five mark zuckerberg property rights economics privacy ireland ubi facebook zero hours inflation star trek BBC care comedians coalition employment silicon valley tuc migrants roma portugal mark duggan tories trans privatisaton strike mark regev nypd rbi feminism cantona consumption socialist eurozone rape salmond student loans middle east protests ncafc catalunya trolling class struggle uk lgbt workfare glasgow desire edl tsipras organising politics asylum marx class Economy spending vaga de totes publishing utopia miliband tax reform digital media sexism bouchart jeremy hunt reproductive rights synthetic hedge mark carney cameron ello he france eu pluralism pablo iglesias greens uber financialisation gender student movement nato lawrence and wishart theft malcolm x privatisation religion Centre Left sussex david cameron treasury productivity videos electoral fraud business native james meek student debt ge2015 capitalism funerals canada james butler birmingham krugman rusell brand david harvey cost of living irish water women mcgettigan marxism hydra bnp david willetts eurovision red wedge britain first social housing olympics met football willetts value midwives morality obama europe charlie hebdo marketing Scottish Independence pay gap buy-to-let nus india uk uncut health ethics Gentrification nurses welfare state open democracy asn future conference season mike brown syria colonialism autonomism cuts demographics Tuzla golden dawn IndyRef 15m eire YesVote eric pickles anarchism debt ge2012 christmas literature austerity ACAB rape culture books occupation depression Labour Party footwear romanichal carpenters review cable communities calais journalism islamophobia millbank Claudia Jones results riots ukraine martin lewis christianity engels isis west bank higher education antifascism pfi secret employee stealing prison cup new york hague rotherham mental health crisis spain masons catalonia gypsies pay airstrikes apps refusal of work Dawkins suicide yes scotland alia al ghussain bingo putin orientalism madness strikes workers post-fordism property police violence orange order uprising intervention homelessness living wage balls rpi social cleansing culture comedy catalan independence workplace reappropriation holocaust hamas womens liberation mubarak andy burnham no borders localism al qaeda inequality libdems anxiety post-capitalism tax nhs big pharma growth technology wages asia scotland police brutality natalie bennett bias travellers immigration universal basic income psoe nef

Do They Owe Us a Living? 7 Reasons the Universal Basic Income is Worth Fighting For.

submit to reddit

The Universal Basic Income (UBI) – sometimes called the Unconditional Basic Income, Citizens’ Income or Social Wage – has in recent times become a focus of economic discussion across the political spectrum. While column inches in the Financial Times and The Economist have been racking up, academics such as Stuart White have been articulating how valid cases for the UBI can be made from communist, liberal and republican perspectives. Here Andrew Dolan offers 7 reasons why the UBI should matter to people who want to move beyond capitalism:

1. Wages aren’t working.

Since the 2008 financial crisis it has become increasingly impossible to survive on wage labour. In real terms, wages in the UK have declined 9 percent in the last 5 years, whilst in the same period the cost of living has risen 25 percent. Combined with mass unemployment and the reduction of welfare the situation is worse than any in recent memory. Whether in or out of work, poverty is a reality for millions of people living in the UK, the world’s sixth largest economy.

2. Full employment is neither possible nor desirable.

From Conservative to Labour to the TUC, the solution offered to this problem is reducible to one dominant idea: economic growth. Grow the economy and jobs will follow, or so the logic goes. Yet as automation accelerates and human labour becomes ever more unnecessary for the production of goods a return to full employment is quite simply impossible, with or without growth. As for an expanding service sector, neither Costa nor Credit Suisse can employ everyone and nor is it desirable that they do. A new response is needed, one that recognises and seeks to overcome these contradictions. A universal basic income is one such response.

3. It’s unconditional.

A universal basic income would ensure that everyone, regardless of employment, earnings, age and gender, receives an income from the state: a single weekly or monthly monetary payment with no stipulations as to how it, or the time of its recipients, is spent. A universal basic income would guarantee a minimum standard of living and relief from poverty where work and current welfare cannot. In this sense, it is an extension of the social democratic promise; as a non-reformist reform, however, it sets the stage for the further transformation of society.

4. It undermines the necessity of work.

However it is funded, as a wage separate from production a universal basic income not only recognises the impossibility of full employment but also has the potential to undermine the mythical sanctity of work—a controlling ideology of capitalism—and accelerate the discussion and struggle over what work is necessary, how it will be done, and for whom. More immediately, a universal basic income could provide the money and time with which to collectively create spaces that embody alternative cultural and social values to those currently dominant.

5. UBI is going mainstream.

Admittedly, the introduction of a universal basic income swims against the seemingly unstoppable neoliberal current, which has accelerated the dismantling of the welfare state and elevated an ethic of entrepreneurial individualism. There are, however, a growing number of mainstream politicians and economists, most notably Paul Krugman, who have voiced support for a universal basic income as a possible solution to the impact of automation and a means through which to redistribute some of the gains of capital and stimulate market demand.

6. UBI represents an opportunity.

Although the vision of Krugman et al remains subservient to economic growth, it is the appeal of a universal basic income to those seeking the maintenance of capitalism that renders its implementation relatively feasible. In other words, the requirements of capitalism—in this instance the need for consumers—create opportunities that can be exploited by those looking to transcend it. If capitalism is to be stabilised once more then let it be on terms more favourable to society and with consequences that lay the foundations for a post-capitalist future.

7. We need to make the case for a UBI on our terms.

One cannot, of course, rely on the largesse of economic and political elites, nor mistake opportunity for inevitability. A universal basic income will not simply be given; it must be demanded, as it has been by growing numbers in Berlin, Rome and in particular Switzerland, amongst others. A universal basic income is not a panacea for the social and economic problems of capitalism and its transformative potential is dependent on greater democratic control of the state and a reduction of the working week. Nor should campaigning for it supersede workplace organising; it should, on the other hand, compliment it. Yet organising for a universal basic income presents the possibility of the employed and unemployed uniting around a shared demand that, whilst recognising the inadequacies of work, seeks not its improvement but the creation of a sphere independent from it.