¡ LIVE NOW @ live.novaramedia.com !
hamas reclaim the streets gaza green party sturgeon bias olympics evictions revolt of the ladders tax care populism brazil politics salmond precariousness west bank start up bank of england nhs desire hospitality trident jeremy corbyn jobs student debt suicide unions fees pharmaceuticals leaders debate occupy homelessness romanichal cost of living antifascism business rbi revuelta de escaleras middle east fe synthetic hedge benefits glasgow working class university of london 22o solidarity trolling law ultras tabitha bast m18 Gentrification football housing crisis YesVote tsipras marxism Race columnism ge2012 asia christmas grexit greek election world cup gdp interest palestine isis magna carta support growth andrew dolan fianna fail marketing syriza localism yes scotland labour movement deep state property vaga de totes blair morality nato rent strike hydra property rights left ipr terrorism alia al ghussain electoralism ahora madrid clegg universal basic income higher education security Secular Crisis ello depression Labour Party trade unions pfi dale farm conservatives rob ford economic privacy intersectionality whiteness atheism omar aziz budget psychiatry is police violence accessibility david harvey bjp pop culture barclays Claudia Jones egypt malcolm x tax reform chris grayling social cleansing newham al qaeda nationalism costas lapavitsas crime putin history books religion uk spain natalie bennett rape help to buy housing action angela mcrobie radical lives education mental health freefede immigration secret employee sport ncafc uffc ttip deflation ubi health precarity debt employment international tube treasury prison refusal of work workers theresa may demands red wedge rojava ulu miliband frankfurt individualism clr james anxiety rabina khan telefonica asn holocaust literature sinn fein public sector estate comedians uprising china eire riots asylum andy burnham balls aboriginal nef focus e15 oxi funerals fracking refusal poverty barts health sisi willetts cup memes BBC internet roma journalism Scottish Independence Tom Abree age obama care work occupation privatization mark carney political economy strategy of refusal france tuition fees oil pride calais hsbc rent cuts Economy mcgettigan pasok tuc martin lewis class socialist apps local government london underground iraq ethics james meadway airstrikes strike sexism mark duggan podemos birmingham ferguson mike brown tories ireland pay russia open democracy athens netanyahu bnp budget2014 david willetts coalition bell hooks industrial action privatisaton Policing neoliberalism Adam Ramsay silicon valley eurovision inequality facebook big pharma conference season catalonia racism architecture value drones nick clegg labour demographics hotels rape culture television crisis scotland plaid cymru cities arran james gender germany interviews automation pluralism engels mubarak yes scotand intervention tactics workplace reappropriation deficit usa northern ireland mhairi black ukraine rmt results gary barlow young people cantona gypsies Niki Seth-Smith jesus george osborne iww housing benefit hague lse social reproduction islamophobia uaf catalunya new york publishing edl protest christianity renting space madness libertarianism autonomism jeremy hunt novara wire Media bias mark regev Aaron Bastani technology future privatisation morsi economics feminism direct action utopia kerry legal aid mental health week anti-capitalism eleanor penny libdems protests sussex five krugman austerity cameron lawrence and wishart police brutality divestment stealing charlie lahr electoral fraud colonialism England imf sussex bonuses miners strike tower hamlets snp europe reproductive rights ge2015 subversion data politicians arab spring review ecb workfare digital media westminster unemployment star trek paul nuttall ual culture media national liberation free speech kobane owen jones portugal money travellers living wage finance new democracy #copsoffcampus pablo iglesias new labour zero hours social networks geography blockadia he chuka umunna productivity mark zuckerberg community organising burnham orientalism sexual violence loans Dawkins consumption 15m financialisation left unity native catalan independence strikes electoral reform eurozone post-capitalism troika comedy banks romani production councils cpi footwear charlie hebdo student movement greens basic income maria miller unite israel millbank theft psoe justice capitalism post-fordism orange order right to buy eu student loans university trans womens liberation eric pickles prevent greece rusell brand barcelona en comu manifesto ACAB kurdistan migrants queer organising hollaback precarious europe citizenship class struggle bingo cooperatives student politics social movements idf cable carpenters welfare state sophie lewis pasokification tax evasion uk uncut james butler legitimacy marx irish water music Centre Left no borders buy-to-let climate syria arms industry fascism india state rpi dan whittall boko haram housing adam stoneman videos mob bouchart Tuzla Elections anarchism antiziganism landlords britain first radical housing network work blockupy IndyRef ge2020 crimea kurds free education modi wages women revolution conchita david cameron social housing projects rotherham canada london golden dawn warwick Police environment pay gap reappropriation UKIP communities government pensions spending lobo bennett Craig McVegas met inflation midwives isil uber maps masons nypd people's assembly safety obr general election nurses james meek thatcher lgbt nus

Do They Owe Us a Living? 7 Reasons the Universal Basic Income is Worth Fighting For.

submit to reddit
Pocket

The Universal Basic Income (UBI) – sometimes called the Unconditional Basic Income, Citizens’ Income or Social Wage – has in recent times become a focus of economic discussion across the political spectrum. While column inches in the Financial Times and The Economist have been racking up, academics such as Stuart White have been articulating how valid cases for the UBI can be made from communist, liberal and republican perspectives. Here Andrew Dolan offers 7 reasons why the UBI should matter to people who want to move beyond capitalism:

1. Wages aren’t working.

Since the 2008 financial crisis it has become increasingly impossible to survive on wage labour. In real terms, wages in the UK have declined 9 percent in the last 5 years, whilst in the same period the cost of living has risen 25 percent. Combined with mass unemployment and the reduction of welfare the situation is worse than any in recent memory. Whether in or out of work, poverty is a reality for millions of people living in the UK, the world’s sixth largest economy.

2. Full employment is neither possible nor desirable.

From Conservative to Labour to the TUC, the solution offered to this problem is reducible to one dominant idea: economic growth. Grow the economy and jobs will follow, or so the logic goes. Yet as automation accelerates and human labour becomes ever more unnecessary for the production of goods a return to full employment is quite simply impossible, with or without growth. As for an expanding service sector, neither Costa nor Credit Suisse can employ everyone and nor is it desirable that they do. A new response is needed, one that recognises and seeks to overcome these contradictions. A universal basic income is one such response.

3. It’s unconditional.

A universal basic income would ensure that everyone, regardless of employment, earnings, age and gender, receives an income from the state: a single weekly or monthly monetary payment with no stipulations as to how it, or the time of its recipients, is spent. A universal basic income would guarantee a minimum standard of living and relief from poverty where work and current welfare cannot. In this sense, it is an extension of the social democratic promise; as a non-reformist reform, however, it sets the stage for the further transformation of society.

4. It undermines the necessity of work.

However it is funded, as a wage separate from production a universal basic income not only recognises the impossibility of full employment but also has the potential to undermine the mythical sanctity of work—a controlling ideology of capitalism—and accelerate the discussion and struggle over what work is necessary, how it will be done, and for whom. More immediately, a universal basic income could provide the money and time with which to collectively create spaces that embody alternative cultural and social values to those currently dominant.

5. UBI is going mainstream.

Admittedly, the introduction of a universal basic income swims against the seemingly unstoppable neoliberal current, which has accelerated the dismantling of the welfare state and elevated an ethic of entrepreneurial individualism. There are, however, a growing number of mainstream politicians and economists, most notably Paul Krugman, who have voiced support for a universal basic income as a possible solution to the impact of automation and a means through which to redistribute some of the gains of capital and stimulate market demand.

6. UBI represents an opportunity.

Although the vision of Krugman et al remains subservient to economic growth, it is the appeal of a universal basic income to those seeking the maintenance of capitalism that renders its implementation relatively feasible. In other words, the requirements of capitalism—in this instance the need for consumers—create opportunities that can be exploited by those looking to transcend it. If capitalism is to be stabilised once more then let it be on terms more favourable to society and with consequences that lay the foundations for a post-capitalist future.

7. We need to make the case for a UBI on our terms.

One cannot, of course, rely on the largesse of economic and political elites, nor mistake opportunity for inevitability. A universal basic income will not simply be given; it must be demanded, as it has been by growing numbers in Berlin, Rome and in particular Switzerland, amongst others. A universal basic income is not a panacea for the social and economic problems of capitalism and its transformative potential is dependent on greater democratic control of the state and a reduction of the working week. Nor should campaigning for it supersede workplace organising; it should, on the other hand, compliment it. Yet organising for a universal basic income presents the possibility of the employed and unemployed uniting around a shared demand that, whilst recognising the inadequacies of work, seeks not its improvement but the creation of a sphere independent from it.