¡ LIVE NOW @ live.novaramedia.com !
james butler china digital media homelessness usa miliband fracking pfi barcelona en comu vaga de totes barclays projects eurozone balls athens scotland mhairi black orientalism economics automation canada jobs environment ACAB radical housing network maps ello rotherham security nef clr james tax evasion idf rob ford whiteness Centre Left intersectionality occupy met engels results omar aziz mubarak charlie hebdo olympics Policing student politics northern ireland value sexual violence cuts ubi westminster productivity europe coalition Aaron Bastani inequality pasok oil native estate kurds he leaders debate star trek tuc britain first manifesto conservatives care Niki Seth-Smith bonuses demographics privacy jeremy corbyn christianity red wedge big pharma revolt of the ladders travellers young people YesVote socialist uffc pride bingo autonomism left egypt funerals christmas womens liberation work Tuzla treasury subversion green party trident cable focus e15 people's assembly imf israel pop culture morsi antifascism interviews owen jones protests journalism trade unions start up desire Elections thatcher hamas England birmingham nato ahora madrid romani unite kobane radical lives asn cup maria miller catalunya islamophobia Secular Crisis justice internet publishing legitimacy greece tax industrial action podemos telefonica mark carney magna carta sexism music syriza social reproduction conference season post-fordism tower hamlets greens ulu airstrikes andrew dolan ultras women books Scottish Independence poverty BBC france comedy trans class struggle inflation mcgettigan production rape culture angela mcrobie law intervention lse ukraine feminism religion gary barlow rabina khan bouchart interest new labour geography health precarious europe west bank reclaim the streets roma london higher education precarity obama russia james meek arab spring education budget2014 rmt nurses electoral reform new democracy 22o age pluralism basic income buy-to-let willetts eurovision uprising catalan independence uber police violence social networks yes scotland isis obr reappropriation politicians loans adam stoneman footwear uk uncut uk Police privatization pasokification financialisation social cleansing ferguson putin bennett marketing fees labour Gentrification space silicon valley business mob antiziganism apps accessibility chris grayling eric pickles unions tax reform state Labour Party david willetts anti-capitalism madness tactics iww working class spain capitalism football cpi eire ipr zero hours mark zuckerberg asia gypsies workplace reappropriation world cup freefede iraq hydra nationalism housing comedians precariousness eleanor penny organising student loans tabitha bast workfare martin lewis barts health george osborne benefits rojava help to buy troika rusell brand pay gap rpi conchita paul nuttall communities bias government al qaeda support glasgow eu privatisation frankfurt millbank midwives Craig McVegas dale farm psoe spending growth austerity depression university rent safety community organising hollaback gender refusal of work cooperatives money romanichal crisis living wage fe ttip isil citizenship memes rent strike Race m18 strike debt future data deep state technology kurdistan columnism culture revolution salmond mental health asylum nus malcolm x property aboriginal rape politics open democracy bnp trolling sussex jesus gaza universal basic income Adam Ramsay suicide irish water free speech occupation newham calais pablo iglesias finance theft nypd tuition fees crimea Media bias crime consumption Dawkins unemployment strikes ual #copsoffcampus climate prison psychiatry david harvey ge2015 15m cantona masons lawrence and wishart bank of england morality sisi ethics snp left unity krugman nick clegg greek election ecb political economy anxiety sussex five international anarchism videos riots secret employee boko haram syria marx landlords care work social movements uaf yes scotand pharmaceuticals libertarianism divestment housing crisis electoralism protest natalie bennett mark regev UKIP germany history colonialism strategy of refusal catalonia dan whittall holocaust workers clegg tories modi bell hooks lgbt marxism is free education review tube university of london social housing hsbc edl media literature post-capitalism new york alia al ghussain neoliberalism hotels kerry labour movement chuka umunna mental health week sophie lewis ge2012 IndyRef Economy deflation queer portugal public sector london underground privatisaton cameron blockadia netanyahu david cameron charlie lahr student movement burnham tsipras populism mike brown blockupy immigration andy burnham architecture electoral fraud evictions blair pay middle east orange order nhs cost of living class localism student debt brazil plaid cymru sturgeon cities novara wire utopia synthetic hedge property rights james meadway palestine atheism reproductive rights carpenters refusal banks wages miners strike television migrants ncafc arran james hospitality india mark duggan general election Claudia Jones welfare state racism rbi jeremy hunt direct action revuelta de escaleras employment ireland golden dawn solidarity stealing Tom Abree facebook warwick no borders demands right to buy bjp libdems fascism national liberation legal aid sport police brutality hague housing action

Do They Owe Us a Living? 7 Reasons the Universal Basic Income is Worth Fighting For.

submit to reddit

The Universal Basic Income (UBI) – sometimes called the Unconditional Basic Income, Citizens’ Income or Social Wage – has in recent times become a focus of economic discussion across the political spectrum. While column inches in the Financial Times and The Economist have been racking up, academics such as Stuart White have been articulating how valid cases for the UBI can be made from communist, liberal and republican perspectives. Here Andrew Dolan offers 7 reasons why the UBI should matter to people who want to move beyond capitalism:

1. Wages aren’t working.

Since the 2008 financial crisis it has become increasingly impossible to survive on wage labour. In real terms, wages in the UK have declined 9 percent in the last 5 years, whilst in the same period the cost of living has risen 25 percent. Combined with mass unemployment and the reduction of welfare the situation is worse than any in recent memory. Whether in or out of work, poverty is a reality for millions of people living in the UK, the world’s sixth largest economy.

2. Full employment is neither possible nor desirable.

From Conservative to Labour to the TUC, the solution offered to this problem is reducible to one dominant idea: economic growth. Grow the economy and jobs will follow, or so the logic goes. Yet as automation accelerates and human labour becomes ever more unnecessary for the production of goods a return to full employment is quite simply impossible, with or without growth. As for an expanding service sector, neither Costa nor Credit Suisse can employ everyone and nor is it desirable that they do. A new response is needed, one that recognises and seeks to overcome these contradictions. A universal basic income is one such response.

3. It’s unconditional.

A universal basic income would ensure that everyone, regardless of employment, earnings, age and gender, receives an income from the state: a single weekly or monthly monetary payment with no stipulations as to how it, or the time of its recipients, is spent. A universal basic income would guarantee a minimum standard of living and relief from poverty where work and current welfare cannot. In this sense, it is an extension of the social democratic promise; as a non-reformist reform, however, it sets the stage for the further transformation of society.

4. It undermines the necessity of work.

However it is funded, as a wage separate from production a universal basic income not only recognises the impossibility of full employment but also has the potential to undermine the mythical sanctity of work—a controlling ideology of capitalism—and accelerate the discussion and struggle over what work is necessary, how it will be done, and for whom. More immediately, a universal basic income could provide the money and time with which to collectively create spaces that embody alternative cultural and social values to those currently dominant.

5. UBI is going mainstream.

Admittedly, the introduction of a universal basic income swims against the seemingly unstoppable neoliberal current, which has accelerated the dismantling of the welfare state and elevated an ethic of entrepreneurial individualism. There are, however, a growing number of mainstream politicians and economists, most notably Paul Krugman, who have voiced support for a universal basic income as a possible solution to the impact of automation and a means through which to redistribute some of the gains of capital and stimulate market demand.

6. UBI represents an opportunity.

Although the vision of Krugman et al remains subservient to economic growth, it is the appeal of a universal basic income to those seeking the maintenance of capitalism that renders its implementation relatively feasible. In other words, the requirements of capitalism—in this instance the need for consumers—create opportunities that can be exploited by those looking to transcend it. If capitalism is to be stabilised once more then let it be on terms more favourable to society and with consequences that lay the foundations for a post-capitalist future.

7. We need to make the case for a UBI on our terms.

One cannot, of course, rely on the largesse of economic and political elites, nor mistake opportunity for inevitability. A universal basic income will not simply be given; it must be demanded, as it has been by growing numbers in Berlin, Rome and in particular Switzerland, amongst others. A universal basic income is not a panacea for the social and economic problems of capitalism and its transformative potential is dependent on greater democratic control of the state and a reduction of the working week. Nor should campaigning for it supersede workplace organising; it should, on the other hand, compliment it. Yet organising for a universal basic income presents the possibility of the employed and unemployed uniting around a shared demand that, whilst recognising the inadequacies of work, seeks not its improvement but the creation of a sphere independent from it.