¡ LIVE NOW @ live.novaramedia.com !
post-fordism james butler wales capitalism tabitha bast iraq mcgettigan primaries spain tabloids protests iwgb care housing benefit national liberation government economics house of commons occupation Tuzla scotland nus journalism hamas environment free education yes scotland refusal jo johnson privatisaton miliband comedy work localism student politics steel industry universities asia portugal russia digital media hollaback indignados womens liberation local government climate natalie bennett crime costas lapavitsas blair focus e15 barcelona en comu arab spring armenia ukba culture socialist canada whiteness cable bis news production charlie lahr help to buy conservatives coalition ultras barclays atheism deflation junior doctors couriers Secular Crisis social strike travellers james meek detention pharmaceuticals students revolution loans rpi ecology trans anxiety Labour Party nurses debt migrant labour rotherham deportation employment david willetts fe technology general election socialism yarls wood picketprofiteers holocaust nypd social cleansing libertarianism strikes london mayor social networks open democracy eu referendum theresa may reclaim the streets Police irish water class struggle legal aid grants bennett catalan independence subversion alia al ghussain bell hooks british empire literature care work middle east architecture andy burnham secret employee left bloc poverty bullshit jobs student movement unemployment aboriginal pride eric pickles telefonica housing left unity homelessness review 22o pasok reshuffle freefede owen jones wages divestment strategy of refusal refusal of work electoral fraud conchita radical lives rent strike food cup trade unions strike bernie sanders martin lewis history bonuses maps refugees oxi obama china politicians netanyahu arran james he white paper orange order greens tax student debt queer deficit funerals value west papua lobo midwives inflation iww Policing paul nuttall uk uncut roma andrew dolan salmond madness ello not fair not safe nhs red wedge blockupy masons domestic violence start up buy-to-let books free speech adam stoneman varoufakis marketing revolt of the ladders radical reformism desire workers print media protest antiziganism vaga de totes independent media jesus sisi conference season mark duggan london underground barts health asylum rabina khan oil unite corbyn lgbt cantona ual clr james bias indonesia memes property asn boycotts pablo iglesias leaders debate long read football ncafc west bank eastern europe nick clegg ulu prison colonialism denis o brien drones presidential race 2016c tuition fees sexual violence Dawkins trolling migrant green party rbi television silicon valley security business utopia europe religion pop culture columnism kurdistan mhairi black workfare theft war spanish election bank of england greece catalunya obr people's assembly hotels reproductive rights councils star trek ge2012 james meadway rob ford comedians millbank magna carta Economy elon musk terrorism bingo riots footwear budget2014 consumption deep state morsi nato jobs ubi precarity freedom of movement sadiq khan working class calais eire estate tube banks revuelta de escaleras cooperatives sweden manifesto lse neoliberalism big pharma Gentrification geography spaceX armenians law tax reform plaid cymru charlie hebdo troika inequality marx met housing crisis nationalism brexit pasokification novara wire social reproduction mental health ukraine age tower hamlets boko haram dale farm athens squatting Claudia Jones islamophobia ref chris grayling labour jeremy corbyn fascism industry communities psoe maria miller soas arms trade radical housing network dan whittall videos gary barlow support pluralism romanichal spending left establishment student strike world cup ludova strana nase slovensko local media energy automation uaf public sector egypt saudi arabia occupy chuka umunna sexual assault fbu sophie lewis uk industry eu populism social media putin kerry universal basic income israel social movements cameron palestine police violence imf omar aziz housing action balls cuts usa solidarity mark carney uffc hsbc mexico interviews crisis tax evasion george osborne Centre Left depression no borders mubarak arms industry isis pensions global warming democrats dover native catalonia hydra individualism space communism cpi edl immigration westminster state uber zabludowicz eurovision remembrance suicide podemos international brigades regeneration arts social democracy property guardians psychiatry safety free papua women house of lords tories marxism ciudadanos budget UKIP labour movement snp university of london tampon tax birmingham new york ahora madrid sian berry prevent christmas david cameron cities malcolm x precariousness crimea anti-capitalism rape culture fracking health thatcher precarious europe rojava youtube unions international gdp krugman visas uprising money ACAB pfi landlords welfare state political economy community organising rhodes blockadia productivity clegg demographics zac goldsmith britain first tuc risk glasgow Race tactics basic income mark zuckerberg cop21 paris attacks police brutality new labour anarchism sussex right to buy financialisation property rights esol nuclear rent democracy armenian genocide survivors novaraeu IndyRef hospitality work ethic novara10k ge2020 mayoral election YesVote kurds bae systems syriza stealing direct action david harvey interest Adam Ramsay ge2015 future spanish civil war pay bouchart fees sturgeon young people far-right libdems unionism feminism 15m zero hours carpenters Aaron Bastani intersectionality tef brazil hillary clinton foreign policy mark regev ethics degrowth human rights growth sussex five is lawrence and wishart workplace reappropriation eurozone post-capitalism benefits libspill student loans mike brown projects australia privatization momentum living wage education warwick tony abbott trident environmentalism autonomism citizenship syria romania willetts angela mcrobie palm oil jeremy hunt electoral reform idf Tom Abree transport slovakia full unemployment grexit rape turkey eleanor penny ferguson rusell brand bnp romani England Elections bds social housing ipr renting erdogan tsipras india heathrow gypsies olympics demands migration finance migrants easter rising Media bias al qaeda apps he industrial action fianna fail frankfurt reappropriation daesh orientalism northern ireland organising magdalene laundries higher education gaza ttip christianity morality cost of living pay gap miners strike fortress europe internet golden dawn modern monetary theory europe week #copsoffcampus modi economic treasury class borders new democracy greek election media privacy iran ecb bulgaria mental health week mitterand m18 Scottish Independence germany sinn fein nef uk alienation facebook london engels yes scotand university forest fire burnham isil evictions pops politics justice john mcdonnell electoralism ireland airstrikes another europe is possible accessibility music hague sport gender antifascism bjp france intervention BBC Niki Seth-Smith racism sexism kobane genocide cnd newham legitimacy data publishing tesla austerity results privatisation synthetic hedge mob rmt gangs

Do They Owe Us a Living? 7 Reasons the Universal Basic Income is Worth Fighting For.

submit to reddit
Pocket

The Universal Basic Income (UBI) – sometimes called the Unconditional Basic Income, Citizens’ Income or Social Wage – has in recent times become a focus of economic discussion across the political spectrum. While column inches in the Financial Times and The Economist have been racking up, academics such as Stuart White have been articulating how valid cases for the UBI can be made from communist, liberal and republican perspectives. Here Andrew Dolan offers 7 reasons why the UBI should matter to people who want to move beyond capitalism:

1. Wages aren’t working.

Since the 2008 financial crisis it has become increasingly impossible to survive on wage labour. In real terms, wages in the UK have declined 9 percent in the last 5 years, whilst in the same period the cost of living has risen 25 percent. Combined with mass unemployment and the reduction of welfare the situation is worse than any in recent memory. Whether in or out of work, poverty is a reality for millions of people living in the UK, the world’s sixth largest economy.

2. Full employment is neither possible nor desirable.

From Conservative to Labour to the TUC, the solution offered to this problem is reducible to one dominant idea: economic growth. Grow the economy and jobs will follow, or so the logic goes. Yet as automation accelerates and human labour becomes ever more unnecessary for the production of goods a return to full employment is quite simply impossible, with or without growth. As for an expanding service sector, neither Costa nor Credit Suisse can employ everyone and nor is it desirable that they do. A new response is needed, one that recognises and seeks to overcome these contradictions. A universal basic income is one such response.

3. It’s unconditional.

A universal basic income would ensure that everyone, regardless of employment, earnings, age and gender, receives an income from the state: a single weekly or monthly monetary payment with no stipulations as to how it, or the time of its recipients, is spent. A universal basic income would guarantee a minimum standard of living and relief from poverty where work and current welfare cannot. In this sense, it is an extension of the social democratic promise; as a non-reformist reform, however, it sets the stage for the further transformation of society.

4. It undermines the necessity of work.

However it is funded, as a wage separate from production a universal basic income not only recognises the impossibility of full employment but also has the potential to undermine the mythical sanctity of work—a controlling ideology of capitalism—and accelerate the discussion and struggle over what work is necessary, how it will be done, and for whom. More immediately, a universal basic income could provide the money and time with which to collectively create spaces that embody alternative cultural and social values to those currently dominant.

5. UBI is going mainstream.

Admittedly, the introduction of a universal basic income swims against the seemingly unstoppable neoliberal current, which has accelerated the dismantling of the welfare state and elevated an ethic of entrepreneurial individualism. There are, however, a growing number of mainstream politicians and economists, most notably Paul Krugman, who have voiced support for a universal basic income as a possible solution to the impact of automation and a means through which to redistribute some of the gains of capital and stimulate market demand.

6. UBI represents an opportunity.

Although the vision of Krugman et al remains subservient to economic growth, it is the appeal of a universal basic income to those seeking the maintenance of capitalism that renders its implementation relatively feasible. In other words, the requirements of capitalism—in this instance the need for consumers—create opportunities that can be exploited by those looking to transcend it. If capitalism is to be stabilised once more then let it be on terms more favourable to society and with consequences that lay the foundations for a post-capitalist future.

7. We need to make the case for a UBI on our terms.

One cannot, of course, rely on the largesse of economic and political elites, nor mistake opportunity for inevitability. A universal basic income will not simply be given; it must be demanded, as it has been by growing numbers in Berlin, Rome and in particular Switzerland, amongst others. A universal basic income is not a panacea for the social and economic problems of capitalism and its transformative potential is dependent on greater democratic control of the state and a reduction of the working week. Nor should campaigning for it supersede workplace organising; it should, on the other hand, compliment it. Yet organising for a universal basic income presents the possibility of the employed and unemployed uniting around a shared demand that, whilst recognising the inadequacies of work, seeks not its improvement but the creation of a sphere independent from it.